08-25-2025, 12:36 PM
I recently came across three different but topically related videos. Together they bring to mind the old Deagel Depopulation Forecast. Remember that?
I have posted them on Bitchute (I'm trying to get away from YouTube with all of the crap they are doing) which, unfortunately, cannot be embedded there. I'll provide the link and you can go watch them if you want.
The first one is from DollarVigilante.com. The presenter mentions a 2024 US gov't budget document that states plainly that if Americans die younger the government can save 5.1 Trillion dollars. Old people cost money. Better to thin out the herd.
The second one (from Dark Journalist) is from an interview with Catherine Austin Fitts. (If you don't know who she is, you should.) She discusses the fertility crisis and the effects that certain "health initiatives" have had on it.
The third discusses the rational behind it all. They just don't need us anymore.
The crux of the three videos taken together is that with the advent of artificial intelligence and robotics combined with an economy that is overstretched and on the brink of collapse and genetic manipulation, it is more expedient for TPTB to just get rid of most of us. The Deagel Depopulation Forecast (published on deagel.com back in 2019) predicted a worldwide population decline of 50% to 80% by the end of 2025.
In the discussion in the past as to whether we were headed for 1984 or Brave New World, I have always believed that the plan was for a blend the worst of both scenarios. I think we are headed there. Deagel may have been off by a few years, and maybe even a few percentage points, but I can see it all coming together.
(A side note: In the Deagle forecast there are wide differences in the population increase or decrease for countries around the world. Most developed countries with predominantly white European stock drop drastically in population (UK -77%, US -68.5%, Germany -65%), while it seems that lesser developed nations do not loose population or actually increase slightly (Brazil +1.4%, Eritrea +2.2%, Mexico 5%). I have not done any serious study on this idea, but a cursory review of the forecasts leaves me with the impression that countries that have a larger percentage of rural population seem to fare better. Perhaps the urban centers are what are intended to be hit hardest?)
I have posted them on Bitchute (I'm trying to get away from YouTube with all of the crap they are doing) which, unfortunately, cannot be embedded there. I'll provide the link and you can go watch them if you want.
The first one is from DollarVigilante.com. The presenter mentions a 2024 US gov't budget document that states plainly that if Americans die younger the government can save 5.1 Trillion dollars. Old people cost money. Better to thin out the herd.
Quote:"The conspiracy is that they wrote it down and you weren't supposed to notice."
The second one (from Dark Journalist) is from an interview with Catherine Austin Fitts. (If you don't know who she is, you should.) She discusses the fertility crisis and the effects that certain "health initiatives" have had on it.
The third discusses the rational behind it all. They just don't need us anymore.
The crux of the three videos taken together is that with the advent of artificial intelligence and robotics combined with an economy that is overstretched and on the brink of collapse and genetic manipulation, it is more expedient for TPTB to just get rid of most of us. The Deagel Depopulation Forecast (published on deagel.com back in 2019) predicted a worldwide population decline of 50% to 80% by the end of 2025.
In the discussion in the past as to whether we were headed for 1984 or Brave New World, I have always believed that the plan was for a blend the worst of both scenarios. I think we are headed there. Deagel may have been off by a few years, and maybe even a few percentage points, but I can see it all coming together.
(A side note: In the Deagle forecast there are wide differences in the population increase or decrease for countries around the world. Most developed countries with predominantly white European stock drop drastically in population (UK -77%, US -68.5%, Germany -65%), while it seems that lesser developed nations do not loose population or actually increase slightly (Brazil +1.4%, Eritrea +2.2%, Mexico 5%). I have not done any serious study on this idea, but a cursory review of the forecasts leaves me with the impression that countries that have a larger percentage of rural population seem to fare better. Perhaps the urban centers are what are intended to be hit hardest?)
It's all the same 🐂💩, just a new shovel.