Discord Discord X/Twitter  
Not a member? Sign up:
Create an account  

Interdimensional Beings: A Research Summary

#1
   

The concept of interdimensional beings—entities presumed to exist beyond the three spatial and one temporal dimension recognized in mainstream physics—resides at the crossroads of theoretical physics, metaphysics, mythology, and fringe science. This paper explores the ontological and epistemological frameworks in which interdimensional beings are discussed, drawing upon string theory, quantum mechanics, religious and mythological accounts, and reports from anomalous phenomena studies. While empirical validation remains elusive, the persistence of this concept across cultures and disciplines invites a careful, critical examination.

1. Introduction
The notion of interdimensional beings has captivated human imagination across epochs and cultures. Traditionally present in religious texts and mystical literature, the concept has been invigorated by contemporary developments in theoretical physics, particularly multidimensional cosmologies such as string theory and brane-world models. This paper surveys the evidence, hypotheses, and interpretive frameworks associated with interdimensional entities.


2. Scientific Foundations for Higher Dimensions
2.1. Dimensions in Physics
In classical physics, spacetime consists of three spatial dimensions and one temporal dimension (4D). However, theories such as:

String Theory posits 10 or 11 dimensions (depending on the formulation), where six or seven extra dimensions are compactified or hidden at Planck-scale distances.

M-theory extends string theory into an 11-dimensional framework involving membranes (branes) and the multiverse.

These theories are speculative but mathematically consistent with aspects of quantum gravity and particle physics.

2.2. Hypothetical Basis for Interdimensional Life
The potential for life or intelligence existing in higher or parallel dimensions arises from these theories. Such beings would likely have access to spatial or temporal domains inaccessible to humans. Hypothetical characteristics include:

Variable geometry or morphology (non-Euclidean bodies)

Time-perception beyond linear progression

Energy forms imperceptible to electromagnetic sensors


3. Philosophical and Metaphysical Interpretations
3.1. Theosophical and Occult Models
Theosophical doctrines, such as those by Helena Blavatsky, posit layered planes of reality (astral, etheric, mental) populated by non-corporeal intelligences. These models are metaphysical but attempt to align with experiences from altered states of consciousness and mystical traditions.

3.2. Jungian Archetypes and Collective Unconscious
Carl Jung hypothesized archetypal entities existing in the collective unconscious, which could be interpreted as transdimensional in nature—not physically manifest, yet universally impactful.


4. Interdimensional Beings in Myth and Religion
Historical and cross-cultural narratives describe non-human intelligences with properties aligning with interdimensional traits.

4.1. Abrahamic Traditions
Angels and Djinn are described as immaterial, timeless, and capable of entering and exiting the human world.

4.2. Eastern and Indigenous Cosmologies
Devas, Nāgas, and other spiritual beings in Hindu and Buddhist lore are said to inhabit subtler realms overlapping the physical.

Shamanic spirits are accessed via ritual and trance, interpreted by some as inhabitants of parallel dimensions.


5. Ufology and Anomalous Phenomena
5.1. Extraterrestrial Hypothesis vs. Interdimensional Hypothesis (IDH)
The IDH, promoted by researchers like Jacques Vallée and John Keel, suggests UFOs and their occupants are not extraterrestrial in origin but rather interdimensional.

Jacques Vallée: Argues that the UFO phenomenon reflects a control system interacting with human consciousness across time.

John Keel: In The Mothman Prophecies, suggests that “ultraterrestrials” influence human affairs from unseen realms.

   

5.2. Paranormal Overlap
Apparitions, poltergeists, and cryptids often exhibit behaviors inconsistent with material reality, including:

Invisibility or shape-shifting

Time dilation or anachronistic manifestations

Sudden materialization/dematerialization


6. Modern Speculative Theories
6.1. Simulation Hypothesis
Proposed by Nick Bostrom and others, this theory implies that beings from higher computational layers could "enter" our simulated dimension—akin to interdimensional intrusion.

6.2. Psychedelic Research and Consciousness Studies
Substances like DMT frequently induce encounters with intelligent entities in “hyperdimensional” spaces, as documented in Rick Strassman’s clinical studies. Interpretations range from neurological artifacts to genuine contact with beings in alternate realities.


7. Criticisms and Challenges
Lack of empirical evidence: No reproducible data confirming interdimensional entity existence.

Anthropocentric bias: Tendency to ascribe agency and intention to unexplained phenomena.

Epistemological barriers: Human cognition and sensory systems may not be equipped to detect or interpret higher-dimensional realities.


8. Future Prospects
Advances in the following domains could potentially shed light on the interdimensional hypothesis:

Quantum computing and entanglement research might uncover interactions with nonlocal intelligences.

Consciousness science may offer new models of perception enabling dimensional access.

Astrophysical anomalies (e.g., fast radio bursts, black hole entropy) could provide indirect evidence of non-standard entities or dimensions.


9. Conclusion
While no conclusive proof exists for interdimensional beings, the concept persists at the intersection of science, metaphysics, and folklore. It reflects deep human questions about the nature of reality, perception, and intelligence. Continued interdisciplinary inquiry—scientific, philosophical, and experiential—is essential for discerning whether interdimensional beings represent a literal truth, a symbolic metaphor, or a limitation of human cognition.


References

Greene, B. (2010). The Hidden Reality: Parallel Universes and the Deep Laws of the Cosmos. Knopf.

Vallée, J. (1969). Passport to Magonia: From Folklore to Flying Saucers. Regnery.

Bostrom, N. (2003). Are You Living in a Computer Simulation? Philosophical Quarterly, 53(211), 243–255.

Strassman, R. (2001). DMT: The Spirit Molecule. Park Street Press.

Keel, J. A. (1975). The Mothman Prophecies. Saturday Review Press.

Blavatsky, H. P. (1888). The Secret Doctrine. Theosophical Publishing Company.


Partially generated with CAAI Research Assistant.

Thoughts?

Beer
[Image: qa.png]
Reply

#2
(06-11-2025, 02:26 AM)MykeNukem Wrote:

Partially generated with CAAI Research Assistant.

Thoughts?

Beer

There has long been a concerted effort to discredit the 'paranormal and lable those who believe in its existance as suffering from some sort of social maladjustment, yet the government has used our tax dollars to study all aspects since at least the early 1920's.

Anybody who's every experienced the 'impossible' knows there are more demensions to our world than are publically acknowledged, so there must be an agenda to official denials.

I think if all of the different scientific brances united instead of discrediting each other there would be a lot more progress made.

[Image: 505900830_24307913532147853_809874014874...e=684F874E]

My first experience with the unexplainable happened when I was three years old. I have spent my entire life looking for and trying to understand the unseen realms of our world. It's been a fascinating journey.





What you aren't changing, you're choosing.
Reply

#3
(06-11-2025, 02:33 PM)Nugget Wrote: There has long been a concerted effort to discredit the 'paranormal and lable those who believe in its existance as suffering from some sort of social maladjustment, yet the government has used our tax dollars to study all aspects since at least the early 1920's.

Anybody who's every experienced the 'impossible' knows there are more demensions to our world than are publically acknowledged, so there must be an agenda to official denials.

I think if all of the different scientific brances united instead of discrediting each other there would be a lot more progress made.

[Image: 505900830_24307913532147853_809874014874...e=684F874E]

My first experience with the unexplainable happened when I was three years old. I have spent my entire life looking for and trying to understand the unseen realms of our world. It's been a fascinating journey.

Science stops with String Theory  Wink The more we investigate, the more common the threads seem ..

Have you posted about that experience? 

Drinkingcheers
[Image: qa.png]
Reply

#4
(06-13-2025, 02:07 PM)MykeNukem Wrote: Have you posted about that experience? 

Drinkingcheers

Which one? I've had so many throughout my life. Biggrin Biggrin Biggrin

I learned long ago that people love the topic but it scares them to the point that they lable you as a weirdo, a freak and ridicule you, so I tend to hold my experiences in.  I KNOW what I've experienced, and I don't throw my pearls before swine, so to speak. 

Some are too painful and personal to share, but they have served to convince me that, no matter how strange, they've all been real. I can only guess as to how or why they happen, which I suppose is my way of coping.

I don't mean to be cryptic, but I'm not quite sure how to go about sharing without sounding like I'm some kind of nut case. I will give it some thought and see if I can figure something out. Maybe I'll just start with 'Once Upon A Time....' Biggrin
Reply

#5
(06-13-2025, 08:13 PM)Nugget Wrote: I learned long ago that people love the topic but it scares them to the point that they lable you as a weirdo, a freak and ridicule you, so I tend to hold my experiences in.  I KNOW what I've experienced, and I don't throw my pearls before swine, so to speak. 

I don't mean to be cryptic, but I'm not quite sure how to go about sharing without sounding like I'm some kind of nut case. I will give it some thought and see if I can figure something out. Maybe I'll just start with 'Once Upon A Time....' Biggrin

I think the bar has already been set pretty high for anomalous experiences here and the likelihood of ridicule is so remote as to be almost non-existent.

You could always put it in the members only section, but I think discussion of these topics should be normalized. The whole shift in the brand here is one that I had hoped might happen and I'd hoped that it would be an environment that everyone could feel like discussing their unexplained experiences was worthwhile.

Nobodyspecial is one of the only people on the open Internet extensively documenting modern folklore without trying to get into some monetization scheme, it just doesn't happen anymore. You have TV ghost hunters and every other influencer rehashing the same stories as they move through their cycles of prominence. Like in the UFO topics, there are a lot of people that their only real ventures into the topic are talking about the topic for money or fame. Maybe less so with ghosts and non-physical entities, but I think that's because they just aren't generating as many clicks.

Ebook author "wizards", clickbait UFO influencers, pseudo-goth emo dudes wandering around old psychiatric hospitals giving themselves jump scares. They're all pretty boring after the first few cycles of rinse and repeat.

I'm excited to hear more and wondered if you might ever share. I'm glad you're considering it.

ETA: I think you'll like the book too!
Reply

#6
(06-14-2025, 01:01 AM)Ksihkehe Wrote: I think the bar has already been set pretty high for anomalous experiences here and the likelihood of ridicule is so remote as to be almost non-existent.

You could always put it in the members only section, but I think discussion of these topics should be normalized. The whole shift in the brand here is one that I had hoped might happen and I'd hoped that it would be an environment that everyone could feel like discussing their unexplained experiences was worthwhile.

Well, truth be told most are highly personal that I don't discuss. If ever I would find myself able to do so it would be here, but would involve opening a door I've tried to keep closed for nearly 60 years. 

I'm not sure if I'm ready to go down that road yet.  Undecided
Reply

#7
(06-14-2025, 12:44 PM)Nugget Wrote: Well, truth be told most are highly personal that I don't discuss. If ever I would find myself able to do so it would be here, but would involve opening a door I've tried to keep closed for nearly 60 years. 

I'm not sure if I'm ready to go down that road yet.  Undecided

That's a different and legitimate concern that only you can decide on.

Just the decision to open that door again is highly personal, without even considering the personal nature of whatever was happening in your life at the time.

If there's doubt, it's probably best to trust your instincts.
Reply

#8
The dimensions are a coordinate measurement system. All things have all the dimensions, as you can't have one dimension without the others. There can't be anything that has only one or two dimensions without all the rest of them as well.

I think the "interdimensional beings" people are referring to are from parallel universes or are interphasic beings that are not on the same "frequency" of existence as we are. A different plane, if you will.
Reply

#9
(06-18-2025, 07:41 AM)Michigan Swampbuck Wrote: The dimensions are a coordinate measurement system. All things have all the dimensions, as you can't have one dimension without the others. There can't be anything that has only one or two dimensions without all the rest of them as well.

I think the "interdimensional beings" people are referring to are from parallel universes or are interphasic beings that are not on the same "frequency" of existence as we are. A different plane, if you will.

Quite possible. 

Tesla thought everything tied into vibration and frequency too.

This reminds me of 'Machine Elves', being on a different 'plane'.

Beer
[Image: qa.png]
Reply

#10
Terrance McKenna had something to say about the machine elves . . .


Reply